|
Updated March 2001
The article about the biological effects
of superlow doses (SLD) of biologically active substances by Professor E.B.
Burlakova in this issue is definitely not an easy reading for anyone but
specialists. It is a detailed review of an extended effort of biologists,
biochemists and biophysicists of the Institute of Biochemical Physics of the
Russian Academy of Sciences and other institutions that sheds light on the
puzzle of homeopathy and brings it to a new and much higher level. (Note,
super-low concentration solutions were prepared in a standard way and whether
or not they were stirred or shaken, used immediately or after aging, the
outcome was not affected. Also, as Dr. Burlakova clarified, the majority of
participating scientists embarked on the program with the intent to discredit
“unscientific” claims of homeopathy, so any effect of experimenter’s
expectation – see J. Solfvin’s article in this issue — may be disregarded.)
The author defines SLD – doses in
concentrations between 10 -12 and 10-20 M, (M stands for molar solution: 1 gram-mole in 1 liter
of solution) – as those “whose effectiveness cannot be consistently explained
in the context of traditional theories and, hence, novel mechanisms should be
explored.” Indeed, at these concentrations there are too few molecules – one
per million or more —to impact cell receptors or interact with enzyme molecules
stoichiometrically.
The author prefers one of the three
hypotheses discussed in the article in attempt to explain the general mechanism
of the effect: the biologically active substances in SLD may interact with organisms,
cells and enzymes through water, i.e., through the modification of the water
microstructure. The problem here is, and it is recognized by the author, that
there are no known carriers of long-term memory in water unless, I would add,
there is a yet unknown fundamental physical interaction, perhaps, the
hypothetical biofield discussed in my previous articles. This, along with the
observed effect of normalization of the physiological function of biological
objects by lowering or enhancing it depending on the initial state of
the object, seems to me, is the most important outcome of the study.
As a short-term result, this study will
lead to development of new less harmful medicines, shed light on curative
effects of diets and put homeopathy on a scientific ground. In view of this
work, it is not excluded that the low intensity radiation of the recently used
ammunition containing depleted uranium might have caused the unexpected
physiological response in people.
Articles by W. Bengston on curing mice injected
with mammary adenocarcinoma and by J. Solfvin on the most peculiar phenomenon
related to the placebo effect – the attitude of the experimenter – are very
much in line with the hypothesis of the biofield pursued by MISAHA. The current
physical description of the universe is based on the observation of inanimate
world only. New fundamental assumptions and a new way of thinking are needed to
incorporate life and life-related phenomena in it. Now, when all the 30,000
genes of the human genome are deciphered (compared to 2,000 of a bacterium), it
becomes clear that the genetic material of the organism acts indirectly, that a
search for a higher level of organization is in order.
Savely Savva
In This Issue:
2001
#30-31
Dear
Friends: |
Monterey Institute for the Study of Alternative Healing Arts
It is the purpose of MISAHA to scientifically validate alternative healing
practices to make them more acceptable to conventional medical practitioners. We
are concerned with healing individuals, but our overriding concern is to
validate the process by which they are healed.
MISAHA is a scientific research center for the study of unconventional medical practices, with emphasis on psi-healing. MISAHA is a clinic providing services to the public. MISAHA is a self-sustaining, nonprofit, tax-exempt corporation
MISAHA is established for the advancement of sciences, and of medical science in particular
· by obtaining unequivocal statistical data on the efficacy and healing effects of the most talented individuals from throughout the world;
· by studying the healing process as a phenomenon by means of physics, physiology and psychology; and
· by presenting results of these studies to the international scientific community in an objective way through publication in scientific periodicals.
A credible description of healing phenomena will bring medical science and biology closer to an understanding of pathogenesis and the physiological function of the mind. In addition, it will broaden the physical picture of the world, introducing the mind as a physical reality.
MISAHA has established contacts with more than 300 institutions in the U.S. and abroad that are involved in the study of alternative medicine and psi-phenomena including the Office of Alternative Medicine of the National Institutes of Health.
Current and future research projects are constantly reviewed in the MISAHA Newsletter and discussed with members of the MISAHA International Scientific Advisory Board.
The organizational concept of MISAHA as a self-sustaining Institute is based on the assumption that as soon as truly efficacious healers are identified and certified with respect to particular diseases through clinical trials, society will be willing to pay for their services, thus funding further research programs.
At this time MISAHA has a list of more than one hundred self-proclaimed psi-healers residing in the U.S. and other countries - a pool for further clinical verification of their effectiveness.
Back issues of MISAHA Newsletter are available at $5 a copy ($10 double issue).
The following are some of the articles
therein:
2000
#28-29
· Savely Savva Comments on the NCCAM Five-Year Plan
· Marco Bischof Biofield Concepts and the Emergence of a Holistic Biophysics
· CORRESPONDENCE BOOK REVIEW
· N. H. Phuong and T. T. Le Oriental Philosophy Fundamentals and Fuzzy Set by Mark Friedman
· PRESS RELEASE by IYXQI
· Savely Savva Ms. Sun Chu-in - The Outstanding Gift to be Studied
· Thomas Dykstra Can Insects Detect Biofields?
· Y. V. Gotovsky Bioresonance and Multiresonance Therapy in Russia
· Karen Ledger New Research in the Energy Psychotherapies
·
Kenneth
Sancier Search for Medical Applications of Qigong with the Computerized
Qigong Database
#24-27
·
1999
#22-23
1998
#20-21
1997
#18-19
#16-17
1996
#14-15
#13.
#12.
1995
#11.
#10
#9.
#8.
1994
#7.
#6.
#5.
#4.
1993
#3.
#2.
Mail donation and/or subscription to:
Cleve Backster |
Prof. Raissa Berg, D.Sc. |
Marco Bischof |
Prof. John O'M. Bockris, Ph.D. |
Dr. Tenzin Choedrak |
M. Allen Cooperstein, Ph.D. |
Don Copland, Administrator |
Vladimir Delavre, M.D. |
Larry Dossey, M.D. |
Prof. Gennady N. Dulnev, D.Sc. |
George Egely, Ph.D. |
Joyce Goodrich, Ph.D. |
William C. Gough, M.S. |
Howard Hall, MD |
Prof. Elendur Haraldsson, Ph.D. |
Prof. Carlton F. Hazlewood, Ph.D. |
Prof. Ruth-Inge Heinze , Ph.D. |
Jamal N. Hussein, PhD |
Shiuji Inomata, Ph.D |
Prof. V. M. Inyushin, D. Sc. |
Acad. V.P. Kaznacheev,D.Sc. |
Stanley Krippner, Ph.D. |
Prof. Vladimir Kukes, M.D., Ph.D. |
Vadim Kvitash, MD, PhD,FAAAAI |
Dr. Ervin Laszlo |
Mei Lei , Ph.D. |
Andrey Li, Ph.D. |
Neeti Mahanti, Ph.D. |
Samuel J. Mann, M.D. |
Lee Pulos, Ph.D. |
Glenn Rein, Ph.D. |
Prof. Rustum Roy, Ph.D. |
S. P. Shurin, D.Sc., M.D. |
T. R.. Soidla, D.Sc. |
S. V. Speransky, D.Sc. |
T.M. Srinivasan, Ph.D. |
Prof. William Tiller, Ph.D. |
Inna A. Vartanian, D.Sc., M.D. |
Prof. R. M. Voitenko, M.D. |
Prof. V. A. Zamkov, D.Sc. |
Xu Hong Zhang, Ph.D. |
|